B-238137:
Apr 27, 1990
A firm protested an Army contract award for a recoil system exerciser, contending that the awardee was a foreign firm. GAO held that although the Army probably erred in restricting the solicitation, it improperly made award to a foreign firm. Accordingly, the protest was sustained, and GAO recommended that the Army: (1) resolicit, and terminate the contract, if appropriate; and (2) reimburse the p...