B-234367:
Jun 8, 1989
A firm protested an Army contract award for refuse collection and disposal, contending that the Army improperly evaluated bids. GAO held that the: (1) Army did not evaluate bids on a common basis, since the solicitation required only those firms offering on-post disposal to price unrelated work; (2) award did not result in the lowest cost to the government; (3) Army reasonably considered the prote...