A firm protested an Air Force contract award for advanced radar warning receivers, contending that the Air Force improperly disclosed source-selection-sensitive information to the awardee. The Air Force contended that the protester failed to show that the: (1) disclosed information was sensitive; (2) Air Force was responsible for the information disclosure; and (3) information disclosure prejudice...

Procurement - Competitive Negotiation - Competitive advantage - Privileged information - Disclosure Protest is sustained where record shows that awardee improperly obtained source selection sensitive information concerning its competitor's product. The contract is for the production of a total of 673 (basic quantity of 19 plus three option quantities totaling 654) advanced radar warning receivers...