[Request for Reconsideration of Sustained Protest of Air Force Contract Award for Microcomputer Workstations]

B-233742.5,B-233742.6,B-233742.7: May 14, 1990

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Two firms and the Air Force requested reconsideration of a firm's protest against an Air Force contract award for microcomputer workstations. GAO had held that the: (1) protester reasonably interpreted the solicitation; and (2) Air Force's waiver of the material specification in the awardee's favor placed the protester at a competitive disadvantage. In their requests for reconsideration, the awardee and the Air Force contended that the: (1) protester's bid did not meet the solicitation requirements; and (2) solicitation was subject to more than one reasonable interpretation. The protester contended that it: (1) would be prejudiced by the reopening of negotiations; and (2) should receive the award. GAO held that: (1) arguments that the Air Force could have raised at the time of protest were not a basis for reconsideration; (2) the awardee's apparent disagreement with the previous decision was not a basis for reconsideration; and (3) the protester would not be placed at a disadvantage by the reopening of negotiations. Accordingly, the original decision was affirmed.

Dec 12, 2019

Dec 11, 2019

Dec 9, 2019

Dec 5, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here