B-233116:
Jan 25, 1989
A firm protested a Defense Supply Service (DSS) contract award for support and analytical services, contending that DSS: (1) improperly awarded the contract at a higher price; (2) improperly used unstated factors to evaluate its best and final offer, and failed to consider certain facts in its proposal; and (3) should have stayed contract performance. GAO held that: (1) DSS properly awarded the co...