B-232553: Sep 28, 1988

A firm protested an Army contract award for housing assemblies, contending that the Army: (1) improperly failed to determine the awardee's capability to meet its proposed delivery schedule; and (2) should have included offerers' ability to meet the delivery schedule as a technical evaluation factor. GAO would not review the Army's affirmative determination of the awardee's responsibility, absent e...

B-232553: Sep 28, 1988

The matter is one of responsibility. The agency has determined a firm to be responsible and the General Accounting Office will not review a challenge to the affirmative determination except in circumstances not present in this case. Speco states that it was told by the Army on September 8 that proposals were evaluated on price and the dates of proposed delivery and that no evaluation was made of t...