[Protests of Proposed NASA Contract Award for Security Services]

B-232133,B-232133.2: Nov 29, 1988

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Two firms protested a proposed National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contract award for security services, contending that NASA improperly adjusted their cost rates. The first protester also contended that NASA: (1) improperly increased its estimated direct labor costs; and (2) should have found the awardee nonresponsible for failure to have the necessary licenses. The second protester contended that NASA: (1) improperly used unstated requirements in evaluating its proposed personnel; (2) incorrectly found that its on-site supervisors lacked sufficient authority; and (3) failed to consider its incumbency when evaluating its orientation and training proposals. GAO held that: (1) it would not consider the contention concerning labor costs, since that had no bearing on source selection and the first protester was not prejudiced; (2) NASA reasonably adjusted the first protester's cost rate, since it did not identify its proposed cost rate as a ceiling; (3) compliance with licensing requirements was a matter to be resolved by the awardee and local authorities; (4) NASA reasonably evaluated the second protester's proposed personnel, orientation, and training; and (5) NASA was legitimately concerned that the second protester would incur an operating loss at its proposed cost rate. Accordingly, the protests were denied.

Sep 29, 2020

Sep 28, 2020

Sep 25, 2020

Sep 24, 2020

Sep 23, 2020

  • Candor Solutions, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because the protester's allegations are untimely.

Sep 22, 2020

Sep 17, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here