B-229765:
Feb 19, 1988
A firm protested an Army contract award for computer equipment maintenance, contending that the Army improperly: (1) evaluated certain costs and awarded the contract to a higher bidder; and (2) rejected its proposal as qualified. GAO held that the Army: (1) improperly rejected the protester's bid as qualified, without discussing the alleged deficiency; and (2) failed to properly evaluate certain t...