A firm protested a National Aeronautics and Space Administration contract award for training and management program support services, contending that: (1) an evaluation committee member had a conflict of interest because of an affiliation with a consultant to the awardee; and (2) three of the evaluation panel members were employees of the panel chairman, who could have influenced their evaluations...

Protester's allegation of conflict of interest on the part of a technical evaluation panel member is dismissed as untimely where it is clear from the record that the protester was aware of the alleged conflict nearly 2 months before filing the protest. Where the record contains no evidence that the technical evaluation panel chairman was biased and unduly influenced the panel members evaluating th...