B-224622:
Nov 17, 1986
A firm protested an Army contract award to another firm for engineering and technical fire support services, contending that: (1) the Army should have awarded it the contract as the low acceptable bidder; (2) the awardee received an unfair advantage as the incumbent contractor; and (3) several Army evaluation officials had worked closely with the awardee. GAO held that: (1) the Army reasonably det...