B-224301:
Dec 2, 1986
A firm protested an proposed Army contract award for facility construction, contending that: (1) the proposed awardee's bid contained a mistake; and (2) the Army should have rejected the bid because its price for an additive item was significantly lower than the Army's estimate and the other bidder's prices for that item. GAO held that: (1) there was no requirement to reject the proposed awardee's...