B-224266.2:
Oct 24, 1986
A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protest against an Army procurement, contending that: (1) naming its parent company as the principal on its bid guarantee was a minor deviation that did not affect the enforceability of its letter of credit; and (2) the parent company acted as its guarantor. GAO held that: (1) the letter of credit was deficient because the protester could not be fo...