A firm protested the Army's rejection of its bid for the lease of five fire trucks, contending that: (1) its bid clearly showed its intent to comply with the Army's required delivery schedule; (2) since it acknowledged an amendment changing the proposal award date, its delivery date was automatically changed also; (3) if GAO would not consider that it changed its delivery schedule when it signed t...

WAS NOT LEGALLY BOUND TO DELIVER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOLICITATION'S REQUIRED DELIVERY SCHEDULE. STATED THAT "THE DELIVERY DATES OR SPECIFIC PERIODS ABOVE ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE GOVERNMENT WILL AWARD BY 4 AUG. 1986.". WILL BE EXTENDED BY THE NUMBER OF CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE ABOVE DATE (THE ASSUMED AWARD DATE). THAT THE CONTRACT IS IN FACT AWARDED.". AMENDMENT NO. 0001 TO THE SOLICITAT...