B-223941:
Dec 15, 1986
A firm protested an Army sole-source contract award for projectiles, contending that it was improper because: (1) it would result in the shutdown of the protester's projectile production facilities; (2) it was inconsistent with the Army's obligation to obtain competition; and (3) the Army's justification for the award was inadequate. GAO held that the Army improperly awarded the contract on a sole...