B-222436:
May 30, 1986
A firm protested an Army contract award to another firm for base support services, contending that: (1) the awardee's bid price was not realistic; and (2) the Army improperly proceeded with the award despite the pendency of the instant protest. GAO held that: (1) as third low bidder, the protester was not sufficiently interested to protest because it would not be in line for award even if GAO sust...