B-221374.9:
Aug 11, 1986
A firm requested reconsideration of the dismissal of its protest of an Army contract award, contending that the dismissal: (1) was erroneous because GAO failed to find that the protester suffered prejudice due to alleged ambiguities in the solicitation; and (2) was unjust because GAO imposed too high a burden of proof for prejudice. GAO held that: (1) the protester's contention that it was prejudi...