B-220935.2: Feb 26, 1986

A firm protested an Army contract award for updating and developing satellite communications equipment instruction courses, contending that the Army fraudulently determined that the awardee was responsible because the: (1) awardee did not meet Army criteria for corporate experience; (2) Army knew the awardee had been in existence for only 3 days prior to the bid closing date; (3) Army should have...

B-220935.2: Feb 26, 1986

BASED ON AN ALLEGATION THAT "CORPORATE EXPERIENCE" DEFINITIVE RESPONSIBILITY CRITERION WAS NOT MET. IS DENIED. "CORPORATE EXPERIENCE" WAS A PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERION TO BE USED BY THE AGENCY IN ASSESSING THE MERITS OF INDIVIDUAL PROPOSALS. THE PROTESTER HAS NOT SHOWN THAT THE AGENCY'S PROPOSAL EVALUATION WAS UNREASONABLE. ALLEGATIONS THAT AGENCY'S AFFIRMATIVE DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY WA...