B-217023.2, JAN 25, 1985, 85-1 CPD 101
Highlights
CONTRACTS - PROTESTS - GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE PROCEDURES - RECONSIDERATION REQUESTS - TIMELINESS DIGEST: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED MORE THAN 1 MONTH AFTER DECISION IS ISSUED IS UNTIMELY. PART 21 (1984)) REQUIRES THAT A REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION BE FILED WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS OF WHEN A PROTESTER KNOWS OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THE BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION. WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. A REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED MORE THAN A MONTH AFTER THE DECISION IS ISSUED IS UNTIMELY.
B-217023.2, JAN 25, 1985, 85-1 CPD 101
CONTRACTS - PROTESTS - GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE PROCEDURES - RECONSIDERATION REQUESTS - TIMELINESS DIGEST: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED MORE THAN 1 MONTH AFTER DECISION IS ISSUED IS UNTIMELY.
NOVAK CO., INC.-- RECONSIDERATION:
BY LETTER RECEIVED ON JANUARY 2, 1985, NOVAK CO., INC., REQUESTED RECONSIDERATION OF OUR DECISION IN NOVAK CO., INC., B-217023, NOV. 26, 1984, 84-2 CPD PARA. 568, WHICH DISMISSED THE COMPANY'S PROTEST TO OUR OFFICE AS UNTIMELY FILED.
WE DISMISS THE REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION.
SECTION 21.9(B) OF OUR BID PROTEST PROCEDURES (4 C.F.R. PART 21 (1984)) REQUIRES THAT A REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION BE FILED WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS OF WHEN A PROTESTER KNOWS OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THE BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. A REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED MORE THAN A MONTH AFTER THE DECISION IS ISSUED IS UNTIMELY. TEOCOM, INC.-- RECONSIDERATION, B-212425.2, ET AL., JULY 17, 1984, 84-2 CPD PARA. 55.