B-215959.2: Sep 11, 1984

A firm requested reconsideration of a decision which dismissed its protests against an Air Force procurement which had been cancelled and then revised and resolicited, arguing that there were improprieties in each. GAO noted that cancellation of the initial solicitation rendered the first protest academic. The second protest was untimely filed and not for consideration. The requester argued that t...

B-215959.2: Sep 11, 1984

PRIOR DECISION FINDING THAT PROTEST WAS UNTIMELY BECAUSE THE PROTEST WAS FILED WITH GAO MORE THAN 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER INITIAL ADVERSE AGENCY ACTION ON AGENCY-LEVEL PROTEST IS AFFIRMED WHERE REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION CONTAINS NO FACTUAL OR LEGAL GROUNDS UPON WHICH DECISION SHOULD BE REVERSED OR MODIFIED. EVEN ASSUMING IT IS FILED TIMELY AND FACTUALLY CORRECT. IS DENIED. PROTESTER HAS NOT SHOWN...