[Protest of Army Contract Award]

B-214137: Feb 28, 1984

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a contract award under an Army request for proposals (RFP) for a dosimetry system. The protester alleged that the award placed a foreign offerer in a favorable sole-source position for the future and that the evaluation criteria of the RFP should have avoided such a situation. The firm also contended that the contract should not have been awarded to a foreign concern in competition with domestic companies. GAO found that, since the protester's main allegation concerned an impropriety in the RFP, that part of its protest would not be reviewed because it was untimely filed after the contract award. Further, once the differentials of the Buy American Act have been applied, there is no legal basis for objecting to an award to a foreign concern which has submitted the best proposal. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed in part and denied in part.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here