[Request for Reconsideration of Sustained Protest Against Army Contract Award]

B-212018.3,B-212018.4,B-212018.5,B-212018.6: Dec 19, 1983

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

The Army requested reconsideration of a GAO decision which sustained a protest of a contract award for the acquisition of a computer. GAO sustained the original protest because the solicitation's requirements had sufficient latitude in their common, ordinary meanings to include all of the interested parties' interpretations, and it recommended that the Army clarify the solicitation's requirements and consider terminating the contract. However, the parties continued to have different interpretations of the solicitation's requirements. Upon review, GAO held that: (1) the solicitation's specifications were still ambiguous because they were subject to more than one reasonable interpretation; and (2) corrective action should not be taken by the Army because the costs of terminating the contract would not be in the best interest of the Government. Accordingly, the protest was sustained, but the recommendation for corrective action was withdrawn.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here