B-208884.2:
Dec 14, 1982
IS UNTIMELY BECAUSE IT CONCERNS AN ALLEGED SOLICITATION IMPROPRIETY WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN RAISED PRIOR TO BID OPENING. THE FACT THAT PROTESTER WAS NOT A BIDDER IS OF NO CONSEQUENCE SINCE THE FIRM CLEARLY KNEW THE SUBJECT OF THE INVITATION AS WELL AS THE BID OPENING DATE. 2. UNTIMELY RAISED ISSUES CONCERNING WHETHER OR NOT THE PROCURING AGENCY SHOULD HAVE USED THE PROTESTER'S FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDU...