https://www.gao.gov/products/118555

B-207145.2: Jun 2, 1982

A firm requested reconsideration of a decision in which GAO held that its protest was untimely. However, the firm did not advance any additional facts or legal arguments to show that the earlier decision was erroneous. Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was denied...

https://www.gao.gov/products/450308

B-207145.2: Jun 2, 1982

DIGEST: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED WHERE REQUEST DOES NOT SET FORTH ANY FACTUAL OR LEGAL GROUNDS THAT WARRANT REVERSAL OR MODIFICATION OF PRIOR DECISION. IN OUR PRIOR DECISION WE CONCLUDED THAT C-TECH'S PROTEST WAS UNTIMELY BECAUSE IT WAS FILED MORE THAN 10 DAYS AFTER THE DEBRIEFING CONFERENCE AT WHICH THE BASIS FOR C-TECH'S PROTEST BECAME KNOWN TO IT. SINCE OUR BID PROTEST PROCEDURES P...