Protest of Competitive Procedures Under Invitation for Bids

B-204634: Feb 2, 1982

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested the use of competitive procedures under an invitation for bids (IFB) issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The solicitation required that a registered professional staff be provided to direct all phases of work under the contract as specified by the Brooks Act and that this staff be approved by the contracting officer before commencement of operations. The protester contended that: (1) because the solicitation required the services of registered professional engineers to supervise the operations, as set forth in the Brooks Act, the entire selection method of procurement for services set out in that Act should have been used; (2) if the required supervision could be performed properly by other than professional engineers, then the invitation's requirements for registered professional staff constituted an undue restriction on competition. GAO concluded that, if the contracting agency determined that the contract operations would be performed independent of any statutory restrictions, competitive bidding could be used in lieu of the selection method set forth in the Act. Therefore, GAO found that the solicitation requirements for a registered professional staff and the approval of that staff before commencement of operations was unduly restrictive of competition where professionals other than engineers could fulfill the requirements. However, this did not mandate the complete use of the procurement procedures contained in the Act. Accordingly, the protest was sustained in part and denied in part.

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.
  • Yang Enterprises, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here