B-203419.4: Mar 16, 1982

A firm requested reconsideration of a GAO decision which denied its original protest. A previous request for reconsideration was denied because the matter was before a court. Subsequently, the court dismissed the case without prejudice so that the protester could pursue the matter with GAO. GAO agreed to reconsider the protest since the matter had been dismissed without prejudice and the protest a...

B-203419.4: Mar 16, 1982

DECISION INITIALLY RENDERED IN RESPONSE TO EXPRESSED INTEREST FROM COURT WILL BE RECONSIDERED AT REQUEST OF PROTESTER WHERE LITIGATION WAS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND THE PROTEST AND RECONSIDERATION REQUEST WERE TIMELY FILED. 2. WHERE PROTESTER HAS NOT PRESENTED ANY ADDITIONAL FACTS OR LEGAL ARGUMENTS WHICH SHOW THAT EARLIER DECISION WAS ERRONEOUS. DOES NOT INDICATE FRAUD ON THE PART OF THE PR...