B-184211:
Sep 23, 1975
A firm protested the award of a contract, contending that: (1) the low bidders were not financially responsible; (2) the solicitation was restrictive and misleading; (3) the bids were nonresponsive; and (4) the solicitation allowed for a buy-in. GAO does not review determinations of responsibility under circumstances of this case. The protest against improprieties in the solicitation alleged after...