B-174314: Apr 6, 1972

IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT NO FUNDS HAVE YET BEEN ALLOTTED FOR SCHEDULE II WORK AND SINCE THE SECOND NOTICE TO PROCEED WAS NOT ISSUED UNTIL DECEMBER 30. IT IS THE OPINION OF THE COMP. THAT BLH COULD LEGALLY HAVE TERMINATED THE CONTRACT ONLY IF THE SECOND NOTICE TO PROCEED HAD NOT BEEN ISSUED DURING 1971 OR WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME THEREAFTER. THE PROVISIONS OF SC-10(H) ARE ONLY APPLICABLE TO THOSE P...

B-174314: Aug 28, 1973

ALTHOUGH THE NOVATION AGREEMENT WILL CONTRAVENE THE ANTI-ASSIGNMENT ACT. SINCE THE EXCEPTION IN ASPR 26-402(A) THAT PERMITS RECOGNITION OF A THIRD PARTY AS A SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT IS NOT APPLICABLE AS THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S INTERESTS IN THE CONTRACTS ARE NOT "INCIDENTAL TO THE TRANSFER" OF THE SUBSIDIARY. THERE IS NO OBJECTION TO RECOGNITION OF THE ASSIGNMENT IF IT IS ADMINIS...

B-174314: Published: Aug 28, 1973. Publicly Released: Aug 28, 1973.

No summary is currently available...