B-163274: Feb 04, 1969

V. KEITH YOUNG: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF JANUARY 14. YOUR LETTER POSES THE QUESTION WHETHER OUR DECISION DEALT WITH THE SPECIFIC ISSUE OF WHETHER THERE WAS LEGAL CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT THE EXECUTION OF THE GENERAL RELEASE WHICH THE ARMY CONTRACT ADJUSTMENT BOARD (ACAB) REQUIRED OF ORTRONIX IN RETURN FOR A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EFFECTED UNDER PUBLIC LAW 85-804. YOUR CONTENTIONS IN THIS...

B-163274: Dec 20, 1968

WHICH WAS RECEIVED IN OUR OFFICE ON JANUARY 8. 000 WHICH YOU STATE WERE SUSTAINED BY YOU IN THE PERFORMANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CONTRACTS DA-36 039-SC-88790 (E) AND DA-36-039-SC-88793 (E). THE AMOUNT CLAIMED IS IN ADDITION TO THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICES AND TO THE FURTHER AMOUNT OF $1.6 MILLION WHICH THE ARMY CONTRACT ADJUSTMENT BOARD (ACAB) AWARDED TO YOU IN SEPTEMBER 1964 UNDER THE EXTRAO...