B-156680:
Sep 09, 1965
TO POWERCON CORPORATION: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTERS OF JULY 14 AND 28. HAS RECONSIDERED THE MATTER AND WE HAVE BEEN FURNISHED THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: "POWERCON'S CONTENTION THAT THE SUPERSTRUCTURE IS NOT A MAJOR ELECTRICAL COMPONENT IS WELL TAKEN. THE PURPOSE IN REQUIRING ALL COMPONENTS TO BE OF ONE MANUFACTURE WAS TO INSURE THAT THE ASSEMBLY WOULD BE AN ELECTRICALLY COORDINATED UNI...