B-154079: Sep 13, 1965

TO SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO LETTER DATED APRIL 2. THE BASIS STATED FOR THE REQUEST IS THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT FURNISHED AT THE TIME OF THE DECISION DID NOT CONVEY ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES REGARDING THE PROTEST. A COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION WAS TRANSMITTED TO HUDSON AND CREYKE. SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION WERE FURNISHED BY YOUR DEPARTMENT AND B...

B-154079: Oct 14, 1964

TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE PROTEST BY TELEGRAM OF MAY 1. WHICH WAS CONFIRMED BY LETTER TO US DATED MAY 4. NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROTEST WAS MADE PRIOR TO AWARD. AWARDED THE CONTRACT TO ANOTHER FIRM AND WE UNDERSTAND DELIVERY OF THE REQUIREMENTS WAS COMPLETED THEREUNDER ON JULY 22. IN THIS CONNECTION WE HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF YOUR LETTER DATED JUNE 26. BOTH SIDES...