INC.: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF FEBRUARY 20. THE RECORD SHOWS THAT IT WAS DETERMINED BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE AIR FORCE. THE SPECIFICATION WAS FORMALLY REVISED ON OCTOBER 17. IS IDENTIFIED AS MIL-W-3818B. WERE INVITED BY LETTER DATED DECEMBER 6. WAS THE ONLY SOURCE THAT SUCCESSFULLY MET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL. THAT FIRM WAS FORMALLY NOTIFIED ON SEPTEMBER 16. THAT THE SAMP...

INC.: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR TELEGRAM OF MAY 8 AND LETTER OF MAY 21. YOUR ORIGINAL PROTEST WAS DENIED BY OUR DECISION TO YOU DATED MAY 4. TO AVOID REPEATING YOUR VARIOUS ALLEGATIONS THE PARAGRAPHS IN YOUR LETTER HAVE BEEN NUMBERED (1 TO 21) AND THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS RELATE TO PARAGRAPHS WHICH SEEM PARTICULARLY GERMANE TO THE PROTEST. DID NOT WARRANT REVISION OF THE PROPOSED SPECIFICATI...