Skip to main content

B-150142, JUN. 12, 1963

B-150142 Jun 12, 1963
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: REFERENCE IS MADE TO A LETTER DATED MAY 21. WE HAVE NO FURTHER RECOMMENDATION IN THIS AREA. WE BELIEVE A DETERMINATION THAT A SET-ASIDE OF MORE THAN 50 PERCENT SHOULD NOT RESULT IN PAYMENT OF A PRICE DIFFERENTIAL IS A NECESSARY AND PROPER PREREQUISITE TO SUCH SET-ASIDE ACTION. A DETERMINATION MUST BE MADE THAT THERE IS A REASONABLE EXPECTATION THE ACTION PROPOSED WILL NOT RESULT IN THE PAYMENT OF A PRICE DIFFERENTIAL. THE DETERMINATION AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION WILL BE MADE PART OF THE CONTRACT FILE.'.

View Decision

B-150142, JUN. 12, 1963

TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE:

REFERENCE IS MADE TO A LETTER DATED MAY 21, 1963, FROM THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY (PROCUREMENT) FORWARDING A DRAFT OF A PROPOSED REVISION TO THE LABOR SURPLUS AREA SET-ASIDE PROVISIONS OF ASPR 1-804.1 (A) (2).

THE FACTORS SET OUT IN SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) THROUGH (V) OF THE DRAFT APPEAR TO BE PROPER FOR CONSIDERATION IN DETERMINING WHETHER A PORTION OF A PROCUREMENT SHOULD BE SET ASIDE, AND WE HAVE NO FURTHER RECOMMENDATION IN THIS AREA.

HOWEVER, WITH RESPECT TO THE PENULTIMATE PARAGRAPH OF THE DRAFT, WE BELIEVE A DETERMINATION THAT A SET-ASIDE OF MORE THAN 50 PERCENT SHOULD NOT RESULT IN PAYMENT OF A PRICE DIFFERENTIAL IS A NECESSARY AND PROPER PREREQUISITE TO SUCH SET-ASIDE ACTION. WE QUESTION WHETHER THE LANGUAGE OF THE DRAFT SETS OUT SUCH A PREREQUISITE WITH SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO PRECLUDE THE POSSIBILITY OF MISINTERPRETATION. WE THEREFORE RECOMMEND THAT THE PENULTIMATE PARAGRAPH BE AMENDED TO READ SUBSTANTIALLY AS FOLLOWS:

"BEFORE A PORTION OR PORTIONS CONSTITUTING MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL REQUIREMENT MAY BE SET ASIDE, A DETERMINATION MUST BE MADE THAT THERE IS A REASONABLE EXPECTATION THE ACTION PROPOSED WILL NOT RESULT IN THE PAYMENT OF A PRICE DIFFERENTIAL. THE DETERMINATION AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION WILL BE MADE PART OF THE CONTRACT FILE.'

WE APPRECIATE THE PROMPT CONSIDERATION YOUR DEPARTMENT HAS GIVEN TO OUR RECOMMENDATION FOR A REVIEW OF THE REGULATION IN THIS AREA, AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT UPON THE PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE REGULATIONS.

GAO Contacts

Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries