B-148496: Feb 14, 1963

THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE CLAIM AND OUR REASON FOR DISALLOWING IT WERE FULLY RELATED TO YOU IN OUR DECISION OF APRIL 10. WHICH WAS NOT FULLY CONSIDERED BY OUR OFFICE AT THE TIME OF OUR DECISION OF APRIL 10. THERE IS NO BASIS UPON WHICH OUR OFFICE PROPERLY MAY MODIFY THE CONCLUSION SET FORTH THEREIN...

B-148496: Apr 10, 1962

YOUR CLAIM IS FOR TERMINAL LEAVE PAY BELIEVED TO BE DUE INCIDENT TO YOUR SERVICE IN THE POST OFFICE AT MEADOWBROOK. YOUR CLAIM WAS FIRST RECEIVED IN THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE ON NOVEMBER 29. THE CLAIMS DIVISION OF OUR OFFICE INFORMED YOU THAT YOUR CLAIM WAS PRECLUDED FROM OUR CONSIDERATION BY THE ACT OF OCTOBER 9. A COPY OF WHICH WAS SENT YOU. SUCH CLAIM MAY BE PRESENTED WITHIN FIVE YEARS AFTE...

B-148496: Published: Apr 10, 1962. Publicly Released: Apr 10, 1962.

A former employee requested that GAO give further consider to action taken regarding terminal leave pay she believed due incident to her service as a Post Office Department employee.GAO determined that the employee's claim was barred from consideration because more than ten full years had elapsed between the date the claim first occurred and the date the claim was first received by GAO. The fact t...