B-146498: Dec 14, 1961

TO PANHANDLE AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF JULY 19. YOU CLAIMED AND WERE PAID THE AMOUNTS OF $948.44 AND $1. THOSE CHARGES WERE DETERMINED TO BE CORRECT. AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED BY THE SETTLEMENT OF JUNE 26. INASMUCH AS THE COMBINATION RATE CLAIMED WAS NOT APPLICABLE BECAUSE THERE WAS A JOINT THROUGH RATE APPLICABLE VIA THE ROUTING...

B-146498: May 01, 1962

TO PANHANDLE AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF MARCH 7. THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO YOUR CLAIM AND THE BASIS FOR OUR ACTION WERE FULLY SET FORTH IN OUR DECISION OF DECEMBER 14. THE SOLE ISSUE IN CONTROVERSY IS WHETHER THE CHARGES COMPUTED BY THE GOVERNMENT AT A ONE-FACTOR THROUGH RATE ARE APPLICABLE VIA THE ROUTE SPECIFIED ON THE BILLS OF LADING BY TH...

B-146498: Nov 16, 1962

TO PANHANDLE AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTERS OF SEPTEMBER 12 AND NOVEMBER 2. THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO YOUR CLAIM AND THE BASIS FOR OUR ACTION WERE FULLY SET FORTH IN OUR DECISIONS OF DECEMBER 14. AUTHORIZES THE USE OF ONE OR MORE GATEWAYS "ONLY WHEN THE MOVEMENT BETWEEN THE GATEWAYS REFERRED TO IS VIA LINES EAST OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER THENCE VIA...

B-146498: Aug 06, 1962

TO PANHANDLE AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF JUNE 6. AUTHORIZES THE USE OF ONE OR MORE GATEWAYS ONLY WHEN THE SERVICE BETWEEN THE TWO GATEWAYS IS PERFORMED EAST OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER. THERE IS NO PROVISION IN ITEM 1010 EXPRESSLY OR IMPLIEDLY REQUIRING THAT SUCH SERVICE BE PERFORMED ENTIRELY BY LINES EAST OF THE RIVER. LOUIS SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY WAS MADE EAS...