B-145294: Mar 30, 1961

WILL BE CONSIDERED AS A REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF THE SETTLEMENT OF THIS OFFICE DATED MARCH 4. YOU WERE ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY EFFECTIVE APRIL 16. YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED ON THE BASIS OF THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF CLAIMS IN THE CASE OF CALIFANO V. IN THAT CASE THE COURT HELD THAT A TRAVEL STATUS CANNOT EXIST FOR A MEMBER OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES IN THE ABSENCE OF A DESIGNATED POST OF DUTY AWAY FR...

B-145294: May 08, 1961

YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED BY SETTLEMENT DATED MARCH 4. YOU WERE ADVISED THAT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF YOUR ORDERS YOUR CLAIM MAY NOT BE PAID BECAUSE OF THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF CLAIMS IN THE CASE OF CALIFANO V. THAT FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION WE WOULD FOLLOW THE RULING IN THE CALIFANO CASE "IN ANY CASE" WHERE A MEMBER IS ORDERED FROM HIS HOME AND ASSIGNED TO A STATION FOR TEMPORARY DUTY UNDE...