https://www.gao.gov/products/414418

B-132372: Jul 15, 1960

SAYS THAT: "THIS IS TO VERIFY THAT MR. WAS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE GOVERNMENT RATHER THAN THE EMPLOYEE. THAT THERE WAS AN OFFICIAL NECESSITY FOR HIS RETENTION UNTIL THAT DATE.'...

https://www.gao.gov/products/479320

B-132372: Jun 07, 1960

WE HAVE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THE EXPLANATION APPEARING IN YOUR ASSISTANT SECRETARY'S LETTER BUT HAVE ONE RESERVATION TO REMOVAL OF THE EXCEPTION. " IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER HIS RETENTION ON DUTY TO THAT DATE PRIMARILY WAS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE OFFICER OR OF THE GOVERNMENT AND WHETHER THERE WAS AN OFFICIAL NECESSITY FOR HIS RETENTION UNTIL THAT DATE (FEBRUARY 20. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT WILL VERIFY THE...

https://www.gao.gov/products/459192

B-132372: Aug 29, 1957

THE REASON FOR THE EXCEPTION WAS THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE THAT F. PATRICK KELLY WAS REQUIRED TO REPORT FOR CONSULTATION DUTIES IN WASHINGTON. NEW YORK) WAS NOT ALLOWABLE. KELLY WAS ASSIGNED TO THE FOREIGN SERVICE RESERVE CORPS (WITH REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 522 (2) OF THE FOREIGN SERVICE ACT OF 1946) FROM A DEPARTMENTAL POSITION OF EXECUTIVE SECRETARY GS-13. KELLY AND HIS DEPE...