THE CHECK WAS ISSUED AS A REFUND OF CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT DEDUCTIONS MADE FROM YOUR PAY WHILE YOU WERE EMPLOYED BY THE GOVERNMENT AND MAILED TO YOU AT YOUR ADDRESS OF RECORD. THE CHECK WAS NEGOTIATED BY SOMEONE IN DUE COURSE. WAS PAID BY THE TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES. SUBSEQUENTLY WAS DESTROYED PURSUANT TO LAW. WAS NOT INTENDED AS CARRYING ANY IMPLICATION THAT YOU DELIBERATELY WERE FILING...

CAROLINE ZWALD: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED OCTOBER 8. YOUR CLAIM WAS CAREFULLY CONSIDERED BY OUR OFFICE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS AND NO LEGAL BASIS HAS BEEN FOUND FOR ITS ALLOWANCE. SINCE THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS FOR THE ALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM. FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE IN THE MATTER WILL SERVE NO USEFUL PURPOSE...

YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED BY OFFICE SETTLEMENT DATED JANUARY 28. FOR THE REASON THAT IT WAS NOT PRESENTED TO THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WITHIN THE TIME LIMITATION SPECIFIED BY SECTION 2 OF THE ACT OF JUNE 22. OR WARRANTS APPEARING TO HAVE BEEN PAID SHALL BE BARRED IF NOT PRESENTED TO THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WITHIN SIX YEARS AFTER THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OF THE CHECK. AS YOU WERE PREVIOUSLY A...

HAVE BEEN FORWARDED HERE FOR REPLY. YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED BY OFFICE SETTLEMENT DATED JANUARY 28. THAT CONSIDERATION OF YOUR CLAIM IS BARRED BY SECTION 2 OF THE ACT OF JUNE 22. OR WARRANTS APPEARING TO HAVE BEEN PAID SHALL BE BARRED IF NOT PRESENTED TO THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WITHIN SIX YEARS AFTER THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OF THE CHECK. SINCE YOUR CLAIM WAS NOT PRESENTED TO THE GENERAL ACCOUN...