TAWES: REFERENCE IS MADE TO A LETTER FROM MR. IT IS RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED THAT YOU NOW RULE WHETHER OR NOT CLAIMANT IS ENTITLED TO THE $10. IT WAS HELD THAT SECTION 212 OF THE ECONOMY ACT WAS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE RECEIPT OF RETIRED PAY. ARE CONCERNED WITH CASES AFFECTED BY THE TANNER OPINION. IT WAS HELD THAT YOU WERE NOT ENTITLED TO RETIRED PAY UNDER TITLE III OF THE ACT OF JUNE 29. SINCE YOU W...

TAWES: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF OCTOBER 12. YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED BY OUR SETTLEMENT OF MAY 21. BARRED THE ALLOWANCE OF RETIRED PAY TO YOU SINCE YOU WERE RECEIVING DISABILITY COMPENSATION PAYMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $404.66 PER MONTH UNDER THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION ACT OF 1916. WE EXPLAINED THAT THE BASIS FOR THE DISALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM AS STATED IN THE ABOVE SETTLEMENT WA...