Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Conditions for Coverage for Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs)
Highlights
GAO reviewed the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) new rule on coverage for organ procurement organizations (OPOs). GAO found that the final rule establishes new conditions for coverage for OPOs that include multiple new outcome and process performance measures based on organ donor potential and other related factors in each service area of qualified OPOS, and CMS complied with the applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Conditions for Coverage for Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs), GAO-06-841R, June 14, 2006
The Honorable Charles E. Grassley
Chairman
The Honorable Max Baucus
Ranking Minority Member
Committee on Finance
The Honorable Joe Barton
Chairman
The Honorable John D. Dingell
Ranking Minority Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce
House of Representatives
The Honorable William M. Thomas
Chairman
The Honorable Charles B. Rangel
Ranking Minority Member
Committee on Ways and Means
House of Representatives
Subject: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Conditions for Coverage for Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs)
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), entitled Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Conditions for Coverage for Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) (RIN: 0938-AK81). We received the rule on
The final rule establishes new conditions for coverage for organ procurement organizations (OPOs) that include multiple new outcome and process performance measures based on organ donor potential and other related factors in each service area of qualified OPOs.
Enclosed is our assessment of the CMS's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that CMS complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report, please contact James W. Vickers, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Marjorie Kanof, Managing Director, Health Care. Ms. Kanof can be reached at (202) 512-7101.
signed
Kathleen E. Wannisky
Managing Associate General Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Ann Stallion
Regulations Coordinator
Department of Health and
Human Services
ENCLOSURE
ANALYSIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(1)(B)(i)-(iv) OF A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES
ENTITLED
"MEDICARE AND MEDICAID PROGRAMS; CONDITIONS FOR
COVERAGE FOR ORGAN PROCUREMENT ORGANIZATIONS (OPOS)"
(RIN: 0938-AK81)
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
CMS performed a cost-benefit analysis of the final rule. CMS states that the first-year cost of implementing the final rule would be $4,815,182, and the average first-year cost to each of the 58 certified OPOs is approximately $83,000.
The benefits of the final rule would be increased organ donation and transplantation with the results of life years gained, improvements in quality of life, resumption of employment for some patients, and an increase in access to dialysis as more patients receive kidney transplants. CMS has calculated a benefit of $1.38 billion in terms of life years saved, which it did not include in the cost analysis.
The total estimated impact of this rule, assuming a 2 percent increase in organ transplants, is $66 million in the first year and $247 million over 5 years. Assuming that Medicare transplants comprise 55.3 percent of all transplants, the estimated impact of the rule on the Medicare program is $37 million in the first year and $136 million over 5 years.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603-605, 607, and 609
The Administrator of CMS has certified that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532-1535
The final rule does not contain either an intergovernmental or private sector mandate, as defined in title II, of more than $120 million ($100 million in 1995 adjusted for inflation) in any one year.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
The final rule was issued using the notice and comment procedures found at 5 U.S.C. 553. On
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501-3520
The final rule contains information collections that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act. CMS has submitted the required information, including the annual burden hours and costs, for the various collections to OMB for approval.
Statutory authorization for the rule
The final rule is promulgated under the authority found in the Organ Procurement Organization Certification Act of 2000 (section 701 of Pub. L. 106-505) and section 1138 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b-8).
Executive Order No. 12866
The final rule was reviewed by OMB and found to be an economically significant regulatory action under the order.
Executive Order No. 13132 (Federalism)
CMS states that the final rule does not have federalism implications under the order.