B-213885.3, SEP 17, 1984, 84-2 CPD 296
Highlights
FILED WITH GAO MORE THAN 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER DECISION WAS ISSUED AND. IS DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY. DISMISSING ITS PROTEST AGAINST THE CANCELLATION OF A PART OF A SOLICITATION BECAUSE WINDWARD WAS AWARDED A CONTRACT TO PERFORM THE SERVICES UNDER A RESOLICITATION. WINDWARD'S RECONSIDERATION REQUEST WAS FILED (RECEIVED) WITH OUR OFFICE ON AUGUST 24. WINDWARD'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION IS UNTIMELY. OUR BID PROTEST PROCEDURES REQUIRE THAT REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION BE FILED WITH OUR OFFICE WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION IS OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN. 4 C.F.R. WINDWARD'S REQUEST WAS FILED 20 WORKING DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OF OUR DECISION. WE ASSUME THAT A PROTESTER WILL RECEIVE A DECISION NOT LATER THAN 1 CALENDAR WEEK AFTER ITS ISSUANCE.
B-213885.3, SEP 17, 1984, 84-2 CPD 296
CONTRACTS - PROTESTS - GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE PROCEDURES - RECONSIDERATION REQUESTS - TIMELINESS DIGEST: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION DISMISSING THE PROTEST, FILED WITH GAO MORE THAN 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER DECISION WAS ISSUED AND, PRESUMABLY, RECEIVED BY THE PROTESTER, IS DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY.
WINDWARD MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC.-- RECONSIDERATION:
WINDWARD MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC. (WINDWARD), REQUESTS RECONSIDERATION OF OUR DECISION IN ACE VAN & STORAGE CO.; WINDWARD MOVING & STORAGE CO., B-213885.2, ET AL., JULY 27, 1984, 84-2 CPD PARA. 120, DISMISSING ITS PROTEST AGAINST THE CANCELLATION OF A PART OF A SOLICITATION BECAUSE WINDWARD WAS AWARDED A CONTRACT TO PERFORM THE SERVICES UNDER A RESOLICITATION. WINDWARD'S RECONSIDERATION REQUEST WAS FILED (RECEIVED) WITH OUR OFFICE ON AUGUST 24, 1984.
WINDWARD'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION IS UNTIMELY.
OUR BID PROTEST PROCEDURES REQUIRE THAT REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION BE FILED WITH OUR OFFICE WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION IS OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN. 4 C.F.R. SEC. 21.9(B) (1984). WINDWARD'S REQUEST WAS FILED 20 WORKING DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OF OUR DECISION. WE ASSUME THAT A PROTESTER WILL RECEIVE A DECISION NOT LATER THAN 1 CALENDAR WEEK AFTER ITS ISSUANCE. KING-FISHER COMPANY - RECONSIDERATION, B-205003.2, JULY 28, 1982, 82-2 CPD PARA. 87. SINCE THE RECONSIDERATION REQUEST IS BASED ON DISAGREEMENT WITH OUR DECISION AND SINCE THE REQUEST WAS NOT FILED WITHIN THE 10-DAY PERIOD PROVIDED FOR UNDER OUR BID PROTEST PROCEDURES, IT IS DISMISSED. SEE KING-FISHER COMPANY - RECONSIDERATION, B-205003.2, SUPRA; DILLON SUPPLY COMPANY; DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY-- REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, B-203937, JAN. 19, 1982, 82-1 CPD PARA. 41.