B-152682, MAY 5, 1964
Highlights
WHICH WAS DISALLOWED BY OFFICE SETTLEMENT OF NOVEMBER 15. YOU NOW ALLEGE THAT DUE TO ERROR YOU WERE RETIRED ON OCTOBER 1. YOU HAVE ENCLOSED A COPY OF A STATEMENT BY DR. THAT THE DATE OF OCTOBER 15 WAS SUGGESTED BY WARDEN GOODWYN AT THE MEETING CONCERNING YOUR RETIREMENT. RICHARDS' STATEMENT WAS PART OF OUR RECORD WHEN WE RECONSIDERED YOUR CLAIM AND RENDERED OUR DECISION OF JANUARY 31. RICHARDS HAS INDICATED THAT THE DATE OF OCTOBER 15 WAS STATED. WAS THE DATE AGREED UPON AT THE MEETING ON AUGUST 15. A REPORT FROM THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION STATES THAT THE RETIREMENT DATE GIVEN ON YOUR APPLICATION FOR RETIREMENT WAS OCTOBER 1. WAS OCTOBER 1. THE DISALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM IS AGAIN SUSTAINED.
B-152682, MAY 5, 1964
TO MR. DENVER C. BRADY:
YOUR LETTER OF APRIL 16, 1964, REQUESTS, IN EFFECT, FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF YOUR CLAIM FOR PAYMENT FOR SICK LEAVE ALLEGEDLY REQUESTED BUT NOT GRANTED PRIOR TO RETIREMENT, WHICH WAS DISALLOWED BY OFFICE SETTLEMENT OF NOVEMBER 15, 1963, AND OUR DECISION TO YOU OF JANUARY 31, 1964.
YOU NOW ALLEGE THAT DUE TO ERROR YOU WERE RETIRED ON OCTOBER 1, 1962, INSTEAD OF OCTOBER 15, 1962. YOU HAVE ENCLOSED A COPY OF A STATEMENT BY DR. A. D. RICHARDS DATED JUNE 21, 1963, IN SUPPORT OF YOUR CLAIM. DR. RICHARDS SAYS, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT THE DATE OF OCTOBER 15 WAS SUGGESTED BY WARDEN GOODWYN AT THE MEETING CONCERNING YOUR RETIREMENT.
DR. RICHARDS' STATEMENT WAS PART OF OUR RECORD WHEN WE RECONSIDERED YOUR CLAIM AND RENDERED OUR DECISION OF JANUARY 31, 1964. WHILE DR. RICHARDS HAS INDICATED THAT THE DATE OF OCTOBER 15 WAS STATED, THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE HAS REPORTED THAT THE DATE OF OCTOBER 1, 1962, WAS THE DATE AGREED UPON AT THE MEETING ON AUGUST 15, 1962, AND THAT YOU MADE FORMAL APPLICATION FOR RETIREMENT EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 1962. ALSO, A REPORT FROM THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION STATES THAT THE RETIREMENT DATE GIVEN ON YOUR APPLICATION FOR RETIREMENT WAS OCTOBER 1, 1962. THUS, THE RETIREMENT DATE SELECTED, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE PRESENT RECORD, WAS OCTOBER 1, 1962. THEREFORE, NO BASIS EXISTS FOR CHANGING YOUR RETIREMENT DATE ON THE GROUND OF ERROR. CONSEQUENTLY, THE DISALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM IS AGAIN SUSTAINED.