B-192008, MARCH 2, 1979
Highlights
DIGEST: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED IN GAO MORE THAN 10 DAYS AFTER BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION IS KNOWN. OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN. IS UNTIMELY AND NOT FOR CONSIDERATION. WELFARE REVIEW THE PROPOSALS OF AMPI AND MOSHMAN TO BE CERTAIN THE AWARD TO AMPI WAS THE MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE GOVERNMENT. NOTES THAT THE ABOVE DECISION WAS RECEIVED BY COUNSEL FOR AMPI ON JANUARY 22. SECTION 20.9(B) OF OUR BID PROTEST PROCEDURES (4 C.F.R.PART 20(1978)) PROVIDES THAT REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION MUST BE RECEIVED IN OUR OFFICE NOT LATER THAN 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION IS KNOWN OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN. SINCE AMPI KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN OF THE BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION WHEN IT RECEIVED THE DECISION ON JANUARY 22.
B-192008, MARCH 2, 1979
DIGEST: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED IN GAO MORE THAN 10 DAYS AFTER BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION IS KNOWN, OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN, IS UNTIMELY AND NOT FOR CONSIDERATION.
MOSHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. - RECONSIDERATION:
ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING, INC. (AMPI), HAS REQUESTED RECONSIDERATION OF OUR DECISION IN THE MATTER OF MOSHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC., B-192008, JANUARY 16, 1979, IN WHICH WE RECOMMENDED THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE REVIEW THE PROPOSALS OF AMPI AND MOSHMAN TO BE CERTAIN THE AWARD TO AMPI WAS THE MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE GOVERNMENT.
THE REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, DATED FEBRUARY 2, 1979, NOTES THAT THE ABOVE DECISION WAS RECEIVED BY COUNSEL FOR AMPI ON JANUARY 22, 1979. SECTION 20.9(B) OF OUR BID PROTEST PROCEDURES (4 C.F.R.PART 20(1978)) PROVIDES THAT REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION MUST BE RECEIVED IN OUR OFFICE NOT LATER THAN 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION IS KNOWN OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN. SINCE AMPI KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN OF THE BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION WHEN IT RECEIVED THE DECISION ON JANUARY 22, 1979, ITS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, RECEIVED IN OUR OFFICE ON FEBRUARY 6, 1979, IS UNTIMELY AND NOT FOR CONSIDERATION.