B-120094, SEP. 10, 1962
Highlights
FURTHER CONCERNS THE DISALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM WHICH WAS THE SUBJECT OF OUR DECISIONS OF JULY 8. OUR DECISIONS CONSIDERED EVERY ASPECT OF THE FACTS AND THE LAW AND REGULATIONS WHICH MAY HAVE A MATERIAL BEARING UPON YOUR CLAIM. TO WHICH YOU REFER AND WHICH IS SET OUT IN 5 C.F.R. 05.4 CITED IN OUR LETTER OF JUNE 8. AS YOU WERE ON OCTOBER 18.
B-120094, SEP. 10, 1962
TO MR. JOHN MADISON:
YOUR LETTER OF AUGUST 14, 1962, FURTHER CONCERNS THE DISALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM WHICH WAS THE SUBJECT OF OUR DECISIONS OF JULY 8, 1954, AND JUNE 8, 1962, B-120094, TO YOU.
OUR DECISIONS CONSIDERED EVERY ASPECT OF THE FACTS AND THE LAW AND REGULATIONS WHICH MAY HAVE A MATERIAL BEARING UPON YOUR CLAIM, AND SET FORTH THE REASONS FOR DISALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM. HENCE, THEY NEED NOT BE REPEATED HERE.
RULE V, TO WHICH YOU REFER AND WHICH IS SET OUT IN 5 C.F.R. 05.4 CITED IN OUR LETTER OF JUNE 8, 1962, TO YOU, CONTAINS NO PROVISION AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION TO ANY EMPLOYEE WHO HAS BEEN SEPARATED FROM THE SERVICE, AS YOU WERE ON OCTOBER 18, 1945.
THEREFORE, WE MUST SUSTAIN OUR DECISION OF JUNE 8, 1962, B-120094, TO YOU.