[Protest of Army Contract Award for Custodial Services]

B-280805: Nov 23, 1998

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for school custodial services, contending that the: (1) Army did not treat the parties equally in conducting the reprocurement because the Army required it to present its English-speaking supervisory personnel immediately, but gave the awardee 2 weeks to produce qualified personnel; and (2) resolicitation was conducted using different terms and requirements than the first. GAO held that the: (1) record did not support the protester's allegation that the Army demanded that it produce bilingual management personnel immediately; and (2) repurchase need not be conducted in accordance with the terms of the original solicitation. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Oct 23, 2020

Oct 22, 2020

Oct 20, 2020

Oct 16, 2020

Oct 15, 2020

Oct 14, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here