[Claim for Retroactive Step Adjustment and Backpay]

B-212085: Dec 6, 1983

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

An Army employee requested further consideration of her claim for backpay and retroactive step adjustment under the highest previous rate rule for job appointments. The employee, who was serving in a temporary position after a reduction in force, was released by the Army when her temporary appointment expired. Following a service break, the employee was reemployed by the Army at a grade that she had previously held, but at a lower step. The employee made an entitlement claim with the Claims Group, which disallowed the claim based upon the discretionary nature of the highest previous rate rule. The Claims Group further noted that the rule is only applicable in cases where the employee has no break in service. The basis for the employee's appeal was that the break in service was improper, causing her to lose the benefit of the highest previous rate rule upon reemployment. GAO held that: (1) the break in the employee's service precluded the use of the highest previous rate rule; and (2) allegations of impropriety concerning denied appointments or violations of reemployment rights are not within the jurisdiction of GAO. Accordingly, the Claims Group's decision was sustained.

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

Mar 12, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here