Skip to main content

Allegations of Improprieties in Proposal Evaluations

B-189603 Mar 15, 1978
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

A protester to a contract award alleged that there were improprieties in the proposal evaluations and that the agency waived a solicitation requirement for the awardee without informing other offerors. There were no objections to: the agency's determination that provisions of one of its regulations were not applicable to a particular situation, the agency's judgment that the offeror's proposed course of action was adequately justified, and the technical evaluation. There were objections to: the agency's request for "clarification" from one offeror before he technical evaluation--this necessitated discussions and calls for best and final offers from all offerors; and the failure of the agency to consider the most recent company experience. The source selection official should reconsider the award selection.

Downloads

GAO Contacts

Edward (Ed) Goldstein
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Kenneth E. Patton
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries