Skip to main content

Cost Factors in CARE Act Formulas

HEHS-95-256R Published: Sep 15, 1995. Publicly Released: Sep 15, 1995.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the effects of proposed acquired immune deficiency syndrome Title I and II funding on eligible metropolitan areas (EMA) and states. GAO noted that: (1) the proposed funding formula, with no cost factor, would increase Title I funding for 30 EMA, decrease funding for 10 EMA, and remain the same for 9 EMA; (2) after 5 years, Title I funding would increase for 32 EMA, decrease for 10 EMA, and remain the same for 7 EMA; (3) Title II funding with no cost factor, would increase during the first year for 15 states, decrease for 13 states, and remain the same for 26 states; (4) some states' Title II funding would remain unaffected because they received minimum grants, reached the funding floor, or were exempt from losing additional funds; and (5) after 5 years, Title II funding would increase for 19 states, decrease for 17 states, and remain the same for 18 states.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

AIDSCommunity health servicesCost analysisstate relationsFormula grantsFuture budget projectionsGrants to statesHealth care costsIntergovernmental fiscal relationsProposed legislation