Skip to main content

Civilian Workforce: DOD Should Assess Lessons Learned to Better Understand Reduction Impacts

GAO-26-108100 Published: May 29, 2026. Publicly Released: May 29, 2026.
Jump To:

Fast Facts

Civilian employees at DOD perform a variety of roles to support the military’s mission. Before reducing its civilian workforce, DOD is legally required to analyze potential impacts, such as on workload and costs.

In 2025, DOD reduced its civilian workforce by about 10%—over 78,000 employees—including by encouraging voluntary resignations and reducing hiring. But we found that DOD didn’t consistently analyze the impacts of these reductions, either in 2025 or in prior years. DOD also doesn’t have a plan to assess lessons learned from its 2025 workforce reductions.

We recommended that DOD assess lessons learned.

A row of empty desks and chairs with an unattended cup of coffee and binders in the foreground, with additional empty desks in the background.

A row of empty desks and chairs with an unattended cup of coffee and binders in the foreground, with additional empty desks in the background.

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

Department of Defense (DOD) components develop their program requirements and estimate needed resources—a phase known as programming—during an annual resourcing process. GAO found that roughly half of DOD components (22 of 40) programmed reductions to their civilian workforces in at least one fiscal year (FY) from FYs 2023–2025. These reductions ranged from 0.1 percent to 9.8 percent of a component’s civilian workforce. GAO’s review of DOD’s FY 2026 budget request identified more reductions than in prior FYs (see figure).

Number of Department of Defense (DOD) Components That Programmed Reductions to Civilian Workforces, n=40

Number of Department of Defense (DOD) Components That Programmed Reductions to Civilian Workforces, n=40

Of the 14 components GAO selected for more in-depth review, 11 conducted some analysis of the impacts of workforce reductions during FYs 2023–2025 to inform their decisions. However, some components did not consistently conduct analysis as required or provide related documentation. According to component officials, DOD had not provided guidance for when and how to conduct and document this analysis. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 includes a provision for DOD to provide additional guidance on analysis required to inform workforce reductions.

Additionally, since January 2025, DOD implemented multiple efforts to reduce its civilian workforce outside the programming process. For example, DOD approved about 53,200 applications for deferred resignations. DOD also hired approximately 59,500 fewer civilian employees from January to December 2025 than in recent years due to a hiring freeze. DOD incorporated some of these civilian workforce reductions into the FY 2026 budget request, per officials.

While selected components conducted some analysis for their civilian workforce reductions since January 2025, officials reported challenges in doing so. Further, component officials identified both preliminary benefits, such as organizational optimization, and challenges, like strained workforce capacity, resulting from the reductions. However, DOD does not have a plan to assess lessons learned from these workforce reduction efforts—a key practice for project and program management. Without assessing lessons learned, DOD may miss opportunities to better understand reduction impacts, inform strategic human capital management, and mitigate any challenges in future efforts.

Why GAO Did This Study

DOD’s civilian workforce performs a wide variety of responsibilities and plays an essential role in the department’s success. By law, the Secretary of Defense may not reduce the civilian workforce programmed full-time equivalent levels without conducting an appropriate analysis of the impacts of the reductions on seven elements, such as readiness, workload, and lethality.

House Report 118-301 includes a provision for GAO to review this analysis. This report examines (1) DOD components’ programmed civilian workforce reductions for FYs 2023– 2025, (2) the extent to which selected DOD components conducted required analysis to inform programmed civilian workforce reductions for FYs 2023–2025, and (3) the extent to which selected DOD components conducted required analysis to inform selected civilian workforce reductions since January 2025 and assessed lessons learned.

GAO analyzed DOD budget and personnel data. GAO also interviewed officials from 14 selected components about analyses for programmed reductions for FYs 2023–2025. GAO further interviewed officials from 12 selected components about analyses to support reductions since January 2025. GAO compared these efforts against section 129a(b) of title 10, U.S. Code, relevant federal internal control standards, and key practices for project and program management.

Recommendations

GAO is making one recommendation for DOD to develop and implement a plan for sharing lessons learned from its workforce reduction efforts made outside the programming process since January 2025. DOD concurred with the recommendation.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Defense The Secretary of Defense should ensure the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness develops and implements a plan for collecting and sharing lessons learned from the department's implementation of workforce reduction efforts in 2025 outside the programming process to help inform any future workforce reduction efforts. The efforts addressed within the plan should include the deferred resignation programs and hiring freeze, as well as any additional efforts DOD deems appropriate. (Recommendation 1)
Open
When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Labor forceGovernment employeesCivilian employeesMilitary forcesFederal hiringMilitary readinessWorkforce reductionsLessons learnedHuman capital managementDefense contracts