Reports & Testimonies
Recommendations Database
GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed. GAO’s priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. Below you can search only priority recommendations, or search all recommendations.
Our recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Moreover, when implemented, some of our priority recommendations can save large amounts of money, help Congress make decisions on major issues, and substantially improve or transform major government programs or agencies, among other benefits.
As of October 25, 2020, there are 4812 open recommendations, of which 473 are priority recommendations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented.
Browse or Search Open Recommendations
Have a Question about a Recommendation?
- For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
- For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
Results:
Subject Term: Pediatrics
GAO-20-110, Feb 12, 2020
Phone: (202) 512-3604
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD did not concur with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Army: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: The Army concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Navy: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: The Navy concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Navy: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: The Navy concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Air Force: Office of the Secretary of the Air Force
Status: Open
Comments: The Air Force concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Army: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: The Army concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Navy: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: The Navy concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Navy: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: The Navy partially concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Air Force: Office of the Secretary of the Air Force
Status: Open
Comments: The Air Force concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Army: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: The Army partially concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Navy: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: The Navy partially concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Navy: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: The Navy concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
Agency: Department of Defense: Department of the Air Force: Office of the Secretary of the Air Force
Status: Open
Comments: The Air Force concurred with this recommendation. As of April 2020, this recommendation remains open.
GAO-19-601, Aug 9, 2019
Phone: (202) 512-7114
- the requirement for states to apply cost avoidance procedures to claims for labor, delivery, and postpartum care services,
- the requirement for states to make payments without regard to potential third-party liability for pediatric preventive services unless the state has made a determination related to cost-effectiveness and access to care that warrants cost avoidance for 90 days, and
- state flexibility to make payments without regard to potential third-party liability for pediatric services provided to child support enforcement beneficiaries. (Recommendation 1)
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Comments: On November 14, 2019, CMS issued an Informational Bulletin providing further guidance to Medicaid Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 2018 and changes to Medicaid Provisions Passed in April 2019-Third Party Liability in Medicaid and CHIP. The intent of the information Bulletin is to further clarify CMS guidance issued in the agency's June 2018 Bulletin on key provisions related to third party liability in Medicaid and CHIP. The Bulletin also addresses April 2019 changes to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013. The bulletin clarifies CMS guidance on two of the three issues we identified in our 2019 report. The bulletin notes that (1) effective February 9, 2018 a state is required to use standard coordination of benefits cost avoidance when processing claims for prenatal services which now includes labor and delivery and postpartum care claims, and (2) effective October 1, 2019, a state is required to make payments without regard to third party liability for pediatric preventive services unless the state has made a determination related to cost-effectiveness and access to care that warrants cost avoidance for 90 days. However, with regard to the third issue, the bulletin notes that, effective April 18, 2019, a state is allowed 100 days to pay claims related to child support enforcement, but does not note that states may choose to make payment within 30 days, if the state determines doing so is cost-effective and necessary to ensure access to care. We will continue to monitor CMS guidance on payments related to child support enforcement to assess whether the recommendation is fully implemented.
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Comments: As of February 2020, we are unaware of any actions taken by CMS to implement this recommendation.
GAO-14-362, Apr 28, 2014
Phone: (202) 512-6722
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open
Comments: In an October 2018 written response, Health and Human Services (HHS) noted that they released 2017-2018 Drug Utilization Review Summaries for Prescription Drug Fee-For-Service Programs as it relates to national statistics on state oversight of psychotropic medications, as well as new state requirements to report on their Medicaid managed care organizations. However, as of August 2019, HHS confirmed they have not issued any guidance to state Medicaid, child-welfare, and mental-health officials regarding prescription-drug monitoring and oversight for children in foster care receiving psychotropic medications through MCOs, as we recommended. We continue to believe that additional HHS guidance that helps states implement oversight strategies within the context of a managed-care environment is needed to help ensure appropriate monitoring of psychotropic medications prescribed to children in foster care.