Reports & Testimonies
Recommendations Database
GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed. GAO’s priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. Below you can search only priority recommendations, or search all recommendations.
Our recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Moreover, when implemented, some of our priority recommendations can save large amounts of money, help Congress make decisions on major issues, and substantially improve or transform major government programs or agencies, among other benefits.
As of October 25, 2020, there are 4812 open recommendations, of which 473 are priority recommendations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented.
Browse or Search Open Recommendations
Have a Question about a Recommendation?
- For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
- For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
Results:
Subject Term: Exports
GAO-20-619, Aug 6, 2020
Phone: (202) 512-3841
Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Status: Open
Comments: In FERC's comments on a draft of our report, the Chairman of the Commission agreed with our findings and recommendations and stated that he has directed FERC staff to develop appropriate steps to implement the recommendations.
Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Status: Open
Comments: In FERC's comments on a draft of our report, the Chairman of the Commission agreed with our findings and recommendations and stated that he has directed FERC staff to develop appropriate steps to implement the recommendations.
Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Status: Open
Comments: In FERC's comments on a draft of our report, the Chairman of the Commission agreed with our findings and recommendations and stated that he has directed FERC staff to develop appropriate steps to implement the recommendations.
Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Status: Open
Comments: In FERC's comments on a draft of our report, the Chairman of the Commission agreed with our findings and recommendations and stated that he has directed FERC staff to develop appropriate steps to implement the recommendations.
Agency: Department of Transportation: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Status: Open
Comments: In the Department of Transportation's comments on a draft of our report, the department concurred with our recommendation and said that PHMSA is currently developing a proposed rule that would incorporate updated standards, as described in our report.
Agency: Department of Transportation: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Status: Open
Comments: In the Department of Transportation's comments on a draft of our report, the department concurred with our recommendation and said that PHMSA has established a timeline for conducting a standards-specific review of LNG facility regulations every 3 to 5 years. We plan to follow-up on the status of the recommendation.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Coast Guard
Status: Open
Comments: In the Department of Homeland Security's comments on a draft of our report, the department concurred with our recommendation and stated that it conducts such reviews as part of its ongoing public rulemaking process. We plan to follow-up on the status of the recommendation.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Coast Guard
Status: Open
Comments: In the Department of Homeland Security's comments on a draft of our report, the department concurred with our recommendation and stated that the Coast Guard is in the process of updating its policy, "Standards Program For Marine Safety, Security, and Environmental Protection Programs," with timeframes for completing standards-specific reviews. The department estimated this would be completed in September 2021.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Coast Guard
Status: Open
Comments: In the Department of Homeland Security's comments on a draft of our report, the department concurred with our recommendation and stated that it is in the process of updating its Manpower Requirements Plan to include timeframes and milestones for completing manpower requirements analyses and determinations for positions and units. The Coast Guard anticipates promulgating the updated plan in March 2022.
GAO-20-394, May 12, 2020
Phone: (202) 512-8612
Agency: Department of State
Status: Open
Comments: The Department of State concurred with the recommendation. When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Agency: Department of Commerce
Status: Open
Comments: The Department of Commerce concurred with the recommendation. When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Agency: Department of State
Status: Open
Comments: The Department of State concurred with the recommendation. When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: The Department of Defense concurred with the recommendation. When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
GAO-20-333, Apr 2, 2020
Phone: (202) 512-8612
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
GAO-20-324, Mar 11, 2020
Phone: (202) 512-8612
Agency: Department of State: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
GAO-20-182, Dec 17, 2019
Phone: (202) 512-8612
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Customs and Border Protection: Office of the Commissioner
Status: Open
Comments: CBP concurred with this recommendation. According to CBP, the new ACE drawback module provides the capability to extract data for workload management. Further enhanced reporting capabilities for drawback claims are under development. CBP's Office of Field Operations and Office of Trade continue to collaborate on a plan to employ risk management principles and automation to resolve the drawback claims backlog and lay the foundation for processing current drawback claims workload. They estimate the completion of this workload management system by October 31, 2020.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Customs and Border Protection: Office of the Commissioner
Status: Open
Comments: CBP concurred with this recommendation. According to CBP, the Office of Trade is exploring alternatives to track and automatically flag duplicate exports across multiple drawback claims. CBP expects to complete their assessment and plan for implementation by December 31, 2020.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Customs and Border Protection: Office of the Commissioner
Status: Open
Comments: CBP concurred with this recommendation. According to CBP, the Office of Trade will work to develop a plan for the use of the Automated Export System (and possibly other systems) for electronic proof of export in the future. They expect this to be complete by September 30, 2020.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Customs and Border Protection: Office of the Commissioner
Status: Open
Comments: CBP concurred with our recommendation. According to CBP, the Office of Trade, in collaboration with the Office of Information Technology, will automate updates that turn the claim selection feature on in ACE. The Office of Trade plans to retroactively identify drawback claims accepted during the lapse period, and is working to implement a solution by December 31, 2020.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Customs and Border Protection: Office of the Commissioner
Status: Open
Comments: CBP concurred with this recommendation. According to CBP, on March 25, 2020, the Office of Trade initiated an analysis to improve automation and targeting on an ongoing basis. Based on the results of this analysis, the Office of Trade will make any needed adjustments to policy and procedures to assist with data quality, by September 30, 2020.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Customs and Border Protection: Office of the Commissioner
Status: Open
Comments: CBP concurs with this recommendation. According to CBP, the Office of Trade is finalizing a plan to conduct an ex post analysis of the impact on industry and government of key changes to the drawback program. CBP's analytical plan will include a timeline and methodology for assessing changes to the program. They expect to complete this by November 30, 2020.
GAO-19-337, May 23, 2019
Phone: (202) 512-6722
Agency: Export-Import Bank of the United States
Status: Open
Comments: In June 2020, we met with EXIM to discuss its efforts to assess the practicality of incorporating into its preauthorization CRTI reviews searches of data elements in SAM that indicate delinquent federal debts owed by applicants. Prior to the discussion, EXIM provided some information on its efforts. As part of the June 2020 discussion, we requested that EXIM provide additional information on its assessment. EXIM agreed to do so. We will provide an update on the status of this recommendation when we confirm what actions EXIM has taken in response to this recommendation.
Agency: Export-Import Bank of the United States
Status: Open
Comments: In June 2020, we met with EXIM to discuss its efforts to assess the practicality of incorporating into its postauthorization CRTI reviews searches of data elements in SAM that indicate delinquent federal debts owed by applicants and participants. Prior to the discussion, EXIM provided some information on its efforts. As part of the June 2020 discussion, we requested that EXIM provide additional information on its assessment. EXIM agreed to do so. We will provide an update on the status of this recommendation when we confirm what actions EXIM has taken in response to this recommendation.
GAO-19-276, Mar 12, 2019
Phone: (202) 512-8612
including 2 priority recommendations
Agency: Small Business Administration
Status: Open
Priority recommendation
Comments: SBA generally agreed with GAO's findings and concurred with our recommendations. In response to our draft report, agency officials said SBA will establish a process that ensures documentation of state recipients' compliance with the total match requirement before grant closeout. In September 2019, officials told us this process will include assigning SBA program office responsibilities for ensuring recipient compliance related to the cost match. In March 2020, SBA officials said they were still working on implementing changes to address our recommendation. GAO will continue to monitor the agency's implementation of this process.
Agency: Small Business Administration
Status: Open
Priority recommendation
Comments: SBA generally agreed with our findings and concurred with our recommendations. In response to our draft report, agency officials said they would develop a process to determine state's compliance with the cash match requirement. In September 2019, officials told us the process will apply to both grants specialists and program officers, and ensure the cost match is appropriately applied. In March 2020, SBA officials said they were still working on implementing changes to address our recommendation. GAO will continue to monitor the agency's implementation of this process.
GAO-18-593, Aug 15, 2018
Phone: (202) 512-3841
Agency: Department of Agriculture: Forest Service
Status: Open
Comments: In its May 15, 2020 correspondence, the Forest Service stated that it is putting together a Corrective Action Plan for addressing the recommendation. It expects leadership review of the plan to be completed in June 2020.
Agency: Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land Management
Status: Open
Comments: In its April 9, 2020 correspondence, BLM stated that a proposed rule continues to be reviewed by Departmental officials. BLM identified December 31, 2020 as a new target date for completing this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Agriculture: Forest Service
Status: Open
Comments: In its May 15, 2020 correspondence, the Forest Service stated that it is putting together a Corrective Action Plan for addressing the recommendation. It expects leadership review of the plan to be completed in June 2020.
Agency: Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land Management
Status: Open
Comments: In its April 9, 2020 correspondence, BLM stated that any action to address this recommendation is contingent upon the completion of Recommendation #2. Once BLM's response to that recommendation is completed, the agency will address this recommendation.
GAO-18-537, Aug 6, 2018
Phone: (202) 512-3841
Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Status: Open
Comments: As of August 2019, we have reached out to the Department of Homeland Security and are awaiting a response on actions they may have taken in response to this recommendation.
Agency: Department of the Interior
Status: Open
Comments: Since August 2018, Interior's Office of International Affairs has updated its contact list for international repatriation assistance with information on the Department's roles and responsibilities in support of international repatriation. In addition, Interior's interagency working group members have developed a description of the interagency working group. However, the statement does not include outcomes and objectives for the group's work. GAO made the same recommendation to each of the four agencies covered in the review because implementing leading collaboration practices will require the collective participation of group members. GAO will keep the recommendation open until further collaborative actions are taken.
Agency: Department of Justice
Status: Open
Comments: As of August 2019, we have reached out to the Department of Justice and are awaiting a response on actions they may have taken in response to this recommendation.
Agency: Department of State
Status: Open
Comments: Since August 2018, the Department of State shared a statement of its roles and responsibilities with other working group members. However, the statement does not include outcomes and objectives for the group's work. GAO made the same recommendation to each of the four agencies covered in the review because implementing leading collaboration practices will require the collective participation of group members. GAO will keep the recommendation open until further collaborative actions are taken.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Status: Open
Comments: As of August 2019, we have reached out to the Department of Homeland Security and are awaiting a response on actions they may have taken in response to this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Justice
Status: Open
Comments: As of August 2019, we have reached out to the Department of Justice and are awaiting a response on actions they may have taken in response to this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Status: Open
Comments: As of August 2019, we have reached out to the Department of Homeland Security and are awaiting a response on actions they may have taken in response to this recommendation.
Agency: Department of the Interior
Status: Open
Comments: As of September 2019, Interior is working to develop an assessment of legislative options for discussion with the interagency working group, and plans to meet with tribes later this fall to discuss the assessment. Interior anticipates a September 30, 2020, completion date for the assessment of these legislative options. Interior has also reviewed legislative proposals related to the export, theft, and trafficking of Native American cultural items and has prepared for Congressional hearings on this topic.
Agency: Department of Justice
Status: Open
Comments: As of August 2019, we have reached out to the Department of Justice and are awaiting a response on actions they may have taken in response to this recommendation.
Agency: Department of State
Status: Open
Comments: In November 2019, the Department of State, in conjunction with other interagency working group members, circulated a draft legal assessment and draft legislative options. The interagency working group members conducted a listening session with tribal members in November 2019, and conducted a tribal consultation in January 2020. GAO will continue monitoring the agencies' efforts toward implementing this recommendation.
GAO-17-443, Sep 15, 2017
Phone: (202) 512-3841
including 2 priority recommendations
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Food and Drug Administration
Status: Open
Comments: FDA partially agreed with our recommendation. According to FDA, the agency is working on a plan to explore the viability of reaching cooperative arrangements with foreign regulatory bodies concerning imported aqua-cultured seafood. In exploring such arrangements, FDA stated that it will seek to explore a means by which the agency can leverage foreign regulatory bodies' seafood safety programs to provide additional oversight for seafood destined for the United States. According to FDA, such arrangements would be negotiated depending on the country's specific situation. We will continue to monitor FDA's specific efforts to implement this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Agriculture: Food Safety and Inspection Service
Status: Open
Comments: As of December 2019, FSIS had not yet acted on this recommendation. According to FSIS officials, the agency made a request to the USDA Office of General Counsel for their opinion on the legality of the recommendation. FSIS is waiting for OGC's response to that request. FSIS maintains that the information submitted by foreign countries as part of the equivalence determination that outlines their chemical residue monitoring plans and the review by the FSIS equivalence staff to ensure these countries employ an equivalent level of public health protection as that of the US already addresses this recommendation. We will continue to monitor how FSIS addresses this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Food and Drug Administration
Status: Open
Priority recommendation
Comments: FDA agreed with this recommendation. According to FDA officials, the agency shared its testing methods for two drugs with FSIS and as of as of April 2019, FSIS and FDA were using the same method for measuring and confirming these two unapproved drugs. In August 2020, FDA told GAO that the agencies convene quarterly to discuss emerging and ongoing research needs in laboratory method development and the establishment of drug residue limits in seafood. We commend FDA and FSIS for taking these steps to share information on testing methods. However, GAO found that the agencies continue to use different multi-residue testing methods that look for different numbers of drugs--99 for FSIS and 40 for FDA--which results in the agencies using different maximum residue levels for some drugs. FDA's method can detect drugs that FSIS's does not and can detect some drugs at lower levels. FSIS's multi-residue method can detect 59 more drugs than FDA's method. The agencies do not have any plans to work on a multi-residue method both agencies can use.
Agency: Department of Agriculture: Food Safety and Inspection Service
Status: Open
Priority recommendation
Comments: According to FSIS officials in May 2020, the agency coordinates with FDA and EPA to carry out the National Residue Program, which entails testing FSIS-regulated products, including catfish, for chemical compounds of public health concern. FSIS officials indicated that FSIS will continue to use its own test methods that meet the agency's pre-defined quality assurance criteria, are applicable to the particular commodity under its jurisdiction, and fit its business model. Thus, FSIS currently does not have plans to work on a multi-residue method that both it and FDA can use on imported seafood, including catfish, as we have recommended.
GAO-17-23, Oct 31, 2016
Phone: (202) 512-2834
Agency: Department of Transportation
Status: Open
Comments: DOT concurred with this recommendation. As of March 2020, DOT had not issued the National Freight Strategic Plan, but DOT officials stated that they are planning to issue it in 2020. To fully implement this recommendation, in the national strategy, DOT should include plans to identify data sources, gaps, information on supply chains and freight networks, and on how DOT will use this information.